§ Data Analysis · Methodology & Interpretation

Data analysis with the interpretation written for you — SPSS, R, Python, defence-ready output.

We don't just run the tests. We pick the right ones for your hypotheses, document the assumptions, hand back a publication-grade results section, and stay on the line through your viva. Reproducible code included.

  • 01Methodology first. Before a single line of code, we agree on the test, the assumptions, and the threshold. No surprises in chapter four.
  • 02Interpretation included. You receive a written results section in your university's format — not just an SPSS output dump.
  • 03Reproducible. Annotated `.R`, `.py`, `.sps`, or `.do` file plus the cleaned dataset. Re-run anything, any time.
  • 04Viva-ready. A 30-minute call with the analyst before your defence. We answer the questions you'll be asked.

New submission

id · DRAFT-26.04
Drop file or click to upload
.docx · .doc · .pdf · max 50 MB
✓ Valid number
Note: At this moment, there is a delay in report generation. We will deliver your report as soon as the technical issue behind report generation gets resolved.
Working in est. 2013 · 27 PhD analysts on staff
SPSS
v.29
Quantitative · social sciences
R
4.4
Statistical · advanced models
Python
3.12
ML · large datasets
STATA
18
Econometrics · panel data
AMOS
28
SEM · path analysis
NVivo
14
Qualitative · thematic
Smart-PLS
4
Structural equation
Excel
M365
Descriptive · pivot tables
Bring your dataset in any format — `.sav`, `.csv`, `.xlsx`, `.dta`, `.RData`, even a clean Word transcript for qualitative work. We handle the conversion.
§ 02 · The deliverable

What lands in your inbox — not just an SPSS dump.

A genuine excerpt from a Marketing dissertation: 412 respondents, brand-trust ↦ purchase-intent, mediated by perceived authenticity. Tables in your university's APA format, code annotated, interpretation written.
Fileresults-chapter-4.docx
Datasetbrand-trust-survey-n412.sav
AnalystDr. P. — Marketing, IIM-A
SoftwareSPSS 29 · PROCESS macro v4.2
4.3 Mediation analysis

To test H3 — that perceived authenticity mediates the relationship between brand trust and purchase intent — a bias-corrected bootstrap mediation analysis (5,000 resamples) was conducted using the PROCESS macro (Hayes, 2022, Model 4). Sample-adequacy and normality checks are reported in §4.2.

Table 4.3 · Direct, indirect, and total effects (n = 412)
PathβSEtp95% BC CI
Trust → Authenticity (a)0.6120.04114.93<.001[0.531, 0.693]
Authenticity → Intent (b)0.4780.0529.19<.001[0.376, 0.580]
Trust → Intent (c′, direct)0.2140.0484.46<.001[0.120, 0.308]
Indirect (a × b)0.2930.039[0.220, 0.373]
Total (c)0.5070.04411.52<.001[0.421, 0.593]

The bootstrap confidence interval for the indirect effect excludes zero (β = 0.293, BC 95% CI [0.220, 0.373]), supporting partial mediation: perceived authenticity carries 57.8% of the total effect of brand trust on purchase intent, while a meaningful direct path remains (c′ = 0.214, p < .001). H3 is therefore supported.

Brand
Trust
Perceived
Authenticity
Purchase
Intent
a = .612***
b = .478***
c′ = .214***
Figure 4.3 · Mediation path diagram. Solid: significant direct paths. Dashed: residual direct effect after mediator entered.
Analyst's note

The mediation is partial, not full — your committee will likely ask why authenticity does not absorb the trust effect entirely. The shortest defensible answer: brand-trust also operates through habituated repurchase, which the survey does not capture. I have flagged this in the limitations section (§5.4) and drafted two sentences you can lift directly. — Dr. P.

You receive Results-chapter `.docx` · cleaned dataset · annotated `.sps` & `.spv` · figures as `.png` and editable `.pptx` · 30-min viva prep call.
§ 03 · The standard

Why this analysis holds up — under a thesis committee.

01

Methodology agreed before code

You will not receive a results section that uses the wrong test. We send you a one-page methodology brief — chosen test, assumptions to verify, hypotheses mapped — and only begin work after you sign off.

02

Assumptions documented, not skipped

Normality, homoscedasticity, multicollinearity, sphericity — every assumption is checked, reported, and footnoted. If your data violates one, we tell you which non-parametric path we took, and why.

03

Interpretation in your subject's language

Marketing dissertations get Marketing prose. Public Health gets Public Health phrasing. We do not return generic statistical paragraphs — the discussion reads like it belongs in your field's journals.

04

Reproducible. Always.

Annotated code, cleaned dataset, version pinned. Six months later your committee asks "where did the 0.293 come from?" — re-run the script, same answer. No hidden-spreadsheet magic.

§ 04 · Catalogue

Tests we run, indexed by family.

A working list, not exhaustive. If your method isn't here, ask — between SPSS, R, and Python the answer is almost always yes.

Descriptive

  • Frequencies
  • Cross-tabulations
  • Central tendency
  • Distribution diagnostics
  • Outlier & missingness reports

Group differences

  • Independent / paired t-tests
  • One-way ANOVA
  • Two-way & repeated-measures ANOVA
  • ANCOVA / MANCOVA
  • Mann-Whitney · Kruskal-Wallis · Wilcoxon

Association & regression

  • Pearson · Spearman · Kendall
  • Linear & multiple regression
  • Logistic · multinomial · ordinal
  • Hierarchical & stepwise models
  • Moderation · mediation (PROCESS)

Multivariate & SEM

  • EFA · CFA
  • Reliability (Cronbach's α, composite)
  • Path analysis · SEM (AMOS / Smart-PLS)
  • Cluster & discriminant analysis
  • Multilevel · panel models

Time-series & econometrics

  • ARIMA · SARIMA
  • Cointegration · ECM
  • GARCH · volatility
  • Granger causality
  • Difference-in-differences

Qualitative

  • Thematic coding (NVivo)
  • Framework analysis
  • Content analysis
  • Inter-rater reliability (Cohen's κ)
  • Discourse · narrative analysis
§ 05 · The process

From dataset to defence — step by step.

  1. i.

    Brief

    Send your dataset, hypotheses, and your university's template. A 20-minute call (free) to scope the work.

  2. ii.

    Methodology brief

    You receive a one-pager: chosen tests, assumptions to verify, deliverables. Approve, and we begin.

  3. iii.

    Analysis & interpretation

    Code is written, assumptions tested, results interpreted. Daily updates by email if the project runs over 48 hours.

  4. iv.

    Delivery + viva prep

    You receive the chapter, the dataset, the code, and the figures. A 30-minute call before defence is included — bring questions.

Working on a journal manuscript instead of a thesis? We deliver in journal-ready format — APA / AMA / Vancouver — with figures sized to publisher specs. Mention the target journal at brief and we'll match the house style.

§ 06 · Pricing

By scope of work, not by page count.

Indicative starting fees in INR. Final quotation arrives within twelve hours of brief — no payment until you approve.
Descriptive
From 6,500
24–36 hrs

Frequencies, cross-tabs, distribution checks.

  • Up to 30 variables · n ≤ 1,000
  • Cleaned dataset + diagnostics
  • Tables in APA format
  • 5-page interpreted summary
Request a quote →
Advanced
From 22,000
4–7 days

SEM, CFA, multilevel, panel, time-series, ML.

  • Model fit · convergent / discriminant validity
  • Up to 3 model revisions
  • Path diagrams · publication-grade figures
  • Reproducible repository
  • 60-min viva prep call
Request a quote →
Qualitative
From 14,000
5–7 days

Thematic, framework, content analysis.

  • Up to 30 transcripts · NVivo project
  • Codebook + theme map
  • Inter-rater κ on a sub-sample
  • Findings chapter draft
Request a quote →
QuotationWithin 12 hrs of brief.
RevisionsUp to 3, included.
Viva-prep call30–60 min, included.
ConfidentialityNDA on request, no charge.
§ 07 · Voices

What scholars say after the chapter lands in their inbox.

★★★★★
I came in with a messy SPSS file and three hypotheses that did not match the test I'd been told to run. The methodology brief reframed the entire chapter four. The defence was the easiest hour of my PhD.
Dr. M. Kapoor
IIM Indore · Marketing PhD
Inferential
★★★★★
Smart-PLS with seven constructs, two mediators, one moderator. They returned the full SEM, the path diagram, and a results section that needed three minor edits. Worth twice what I paid.
A. Rao
Anna University · PhD
Advanced (SEM)
★★★★★
The viva prep call was the unexpected gift. We rehearsed the three questions my external could ask about the indirect effect — and he asked exactly one of them.
Pranay G.
Manipal · MPhil
Inferential
★★★★★
Eighteen NVivo transcripts, three weeks until submission. They sent the codebook for review on day three, the theme map on day five, and the chapter on day seven. The ICC was 0.81.
Dr. S. Iqbal
JNU · Sociology
Qualitative
★★★★★
I asked for the analysis in R because my supervisor reads code. They sent a knitted RMarkdown document with assumption plots inline. I have used it as the methodology template for two more papers since.
Dr. R. Iyer
IIT Madras
Advanced (R)
★★★★★
Honest about scope. They told me my dataset (n = 84) was underpowered for the moderation I wanted, recommended a simpler model, and saved me from a viva I would have lost.
A. Sengupta
JU Kolkata · PhD
Inferential
Questions

FAQ

  • The process is straightforward. Once you submit your dataset and requirements, our expert will connect with you on a call to understand your research objectives, clarify doubts, and agree on the approach. Work begins immediately after the discussion. You will receive the complete analysis along with output files, charts, and interpretation.

§ Begin

Send the dataset. Receive the chapter.

SPSS, R, Python, STATA, AMOS, NVivo. Methodology brief before code. Cleaned data, interpreted results, reproducible scripts, and a viva-prep call before your defence.

  • Quote · Within 12 hrs of brief
  • Turnaround · 24 hrs to 7 days, by scope
  • Pricing · From ₹6,500 · scope-based
  • Confidentiality · NDA on request, no charge

New submission

id · DRAFT-26.04
Drop file or click to upload
.docx · .doc · .pdf · max 50 MB
✓ Valid number
Note: At this moment, there is a delay in report generation. We will deliver your report as soon as the technical issue behind report generation gets resolved.