Chapter
From
₹30
/ pg
24 hrs
For a single chapter, a paper draft, or a coursework submission.
- Up to 25 pages
- Sentence-level grammar pass
- Track-changes + clean copy
- One-line reason on every edit
§ Grammar Correction · Sentence-level fixes
Sentence-level grammar correction, returned with every edit annotated — visible to your supervisor.
Articles, tense, subject–verb agreement, prepositions, register, run-ons, dangling modifiers, word choice. A PhD subject editor reads each sentence, fixes what is wrong, and leaves a one-line reason in the margin. Your argument is untouched — only the prose around it changes.
- 01Every edit annotated. Open the file, accept what you agree with, query what you don't. Your supervisor reads the same diff and sees exactly what we did.
- 02Eight error categories, one editor. The same person who fixes your articles also fixes your tense and your register. No hand-offs, no inconsistencies between paragraphs.
- 03Argument preserved, voice preserved. We correct grammar; we do not rewrite ideas. If a sentence says something we disagree with, it still says it after our pass — just grammatically.
- 0414,000+ chapters edited since 2013. Theses, journal submissions, dissertations across thirty-plus disciplines.
Eight error classes · one editor per chapter
Articles
a · an · the
Most common edit · ESL hot-spot
Tense
past · present · pf.
Methods vs. results consistency
Agreement
subject–verb
Compound subjects · collective nouns
Prepositions
in · on · at · of
Idiomatic, not grammatical
Run-ons
comma splice · fused
Long sentences split or rebuilt
Register
formal academic
Colloquial → register-appropriate
Modifiers
dangling · misplaced
Reordered for unambiguous reading
Word choice
precision · register
Vague verbs sharpened, not flattened
Eight categories, but the work is one read-through. The same editor who corrects your articles also corrects your tense and your register — so the chapter reads as a single voice, not eight passes stitched together.
§ 02 · The signature
What returns to your inbox — every edit annotated.
A genuine paragraph from a Materials Science methods section. Eighteen edits across eight categories. Toggle a chip to isolate one error class at a time — and to see the editor's one-line reason in the rail on the right.
Methodology — sample preparation
p. 47
04
In the second phase of the experiment, four cylindrical specimens
05
were machined to ASTM D3039 dimensions and we collectcollected tensile data at five
06
strain rates. Each specimen group was tested on a calibrated MTS frame, and the
07
composite layup was assumed to consist fromconsist of eight unidirectional plies of
08
equal thickness. Stress was logged at one-millisecond intervals.
09
The resulting data showsshow a clear knee-point near 10⁶ cycles, beyond which the
10
modulus degrades approximately linearly with cycle count.
11
We expected a sharp transition at this period,; however, the curve
12
flattens earlier than the Tsai-Wu prediction would suggest.
13
Across replicates, we got really goodwe obtained robust agreement on the elastic
14
modulus, with a coefficient of variation under three percent.
15
Heated to 80 °C, weHeated to 80 °C, the sample noted a softening response in the matrix-
16
dominated direction within forty seconds of thermal equilibration.
17
To utiliseuse the data in a finite-element model, we exported each
18
stress-strain curve to CSV and tagged it with the corresponding strain rate.
Net effect
18 edits across 8 categories — argument unchanged, citations unchanged, equations unchanged. The paragraph reads cleaner; the meaning is exactly what you wrote.
Returned as
.docx with every edit annotated · clean copy as a second file · one-page summary of the edit pattern (which categories were heaviest, where to watch in chapter 4).
§ 03 · The method
Why a person corrects grammar better than a checker ever will.
01
Grammar in context, not in isolation
A checker flags every "data is" as wrong; a subject editor reads the surrounding paragraph and decides. Sometimes the collective singular is what your discipline prefers — and it stays. We correct grammar that breaks meaning, not grammar that simply differs from the textbook.
02
Articles, the way English actually works
A · an · the is the single hardest area for non-native writers and the one no checker gets right. Our editors fix it from the meaning of your sentence — definite vs. indefinite, generic vs. specific, count vs. mass — not from a confidence score. Most chapters come back with thirty to sixty article fixes; the difference in readability is immediate.
03
Register, not just rules
Methods sections sound different from a discussion. A discussion sounds different from an abstract. We tune your register — formal academic, hedged claims, passive where it belongs — without flattening your voice into the dead, thesaurus-driven prose a tool produces.
04
Every edit comes with a reason
Every edit annotated, plus a one-line note in the margin: why this comma, why past simple, why the article. You learn the patterns as you accept the edits — by the time chapter four comes back, you are catching half of them yourself.
§ 04 · Catalogue
What we correct, indexed by class.
A working list, not exhaustive. Punctuation, hyphenation, capitalisation, and discipline-specific spelling (BrE / AmE) are corrected as part of the same pass — at no extra fee. If your supervisor has a list of pet hates, send it; we honour it.
Articles & determiners
- Definite vs. indefinite (a · an · the)
- Generic vs. specific reference
- Count vs. mass nouns · zero article
- Demonstratives (this · that · these)
- Quantifiers (much · many · few · little)
Tense & aspect
- Past simple vs. present perfect
- Methods (past) vs. results (past)
- Discussion (present + perfect)
- Reporting verbs · author tense
- Conditionals · hedged claims
Agreement & concord
- Subject–verb · compound subjects
- Collective nouns by discipline
- Each · every · either · neither
- Quantified expressions ("a number of")
- Pronoun–antecedent agreement
Prepositions & idiom
- Verb + preposition pairings
- Adjective + preposition pairings
- Phrasal verbs in academic register
- Comparison: "different from / to / than"
- Time, place, and abstract uses
Sentence structure
- Run-ons & comma splices
- Fragments & hanging clauses
- Dangling & misplaced modifiers
- Parallelism in lists & series
- Sentence length & rhythm
Register & word choice
- Colloquial → formal academic
- Vague verbs → precise verbs
- Hedging language (may · suggests)
- Wordiness · nominalisation balance
- Discipline-specific terminology
§ 05 · The process
What happens after you upload — step by step.
- i.
Upload
Drop your chapter or manuscript and tell us a deadline that suits you. Optional: send the supervisor's style preferences if any (BrE/AmE, Oxford comma, hedging level). Takes a minute.
- ii.
Quote · within twelve hours
We open the file, count pages excluding bibliography and quoted blocks, choose the right tier by manuscript stage, and email a quotation. No payment until you approve.
- iii.
Subject editor reads & corrects
Your file is hand-matched to a PhD editor in your discipline. They read each sentence, fix what is wrong, and leave a one-line reason for every non-trivial change in the margin.
- iv.
Delivery — track-changes + clean copy
You receive two files: the marked-up .docx (every edit annotated, comments inline) and a clean copy with everything accepted. Plus a one-page summary of edit patterns and where to watch in the next chapter.
Already at the journal-submission stage? Pair Grammar Correction with Document Formatting for a single, journal-ready manuscript. Copy-edit and reference reconciliation can be bundled — ask at quote.
§ 06 · Pricing
Per page, by scope and turnaround.
Indicative starting fees in INR per page. Bibliography and block quotations are excluded from the page count. Final quotation arrives within twelve hours of brief — no payment until you approve.
Most common
Manuscript
From
₹25
/ pg
48–72 hrs
Whole-thesis or full journal manuscript. The most common slab.
- 25–150 pages
- Subject-matched PhD editor
- Punctuation & spelling included
- Pattern summary · what to watch
- 7-day touch-up window
- BrE / AmE consistency lock
Journal-ready
From
₹35
/ pg
4–5 days
Pre-submission grammar pass tuned to the target journal's register.
- Target journal's house preferences
- Abstract tightened to word limit
- Cover-letter language polish
- Re-read on revision, no charge
- Reviewer-comment language pass
Express
From
₹50
/ pg
12 hrs
When the deadline is tomorrow morning. Same editorial standard, faster.
- Up to 40 pages
- Returned within 12 hours
- Senior editor on the desk
- Phone & WhatsApp through the night
- Subject to editor availability
Page definition250 words · A4 · double-spaced.
ExcludedBibliography & quoted blocks.
Touch-upsFree for 7 days post-delivery.
§ 07 · Voices
What scholars say after the marked-up file lands in their inbox.
★★★★★
Every edit annotated, with a one-line reason in the margin — exactly what my supervisor wanted to see. He read the diff once and signed off the chapter the same evening.
Priya R.
JNU · PhD English
Grammar Correction
★★★★★
Forty-two article fixes in the methods chapter alone. None of them changed what I meant — but the chapter reads twice as smoothly. Two weeks later I caught half the same patterns in chapter four myself.
A. Verma
IIT Kharagpur · M.Tech
Grammar Correction
★★★★★
What I did not expect was the pattern summary at the end. One page on which categories were heaviest in my draft and what to watch for next time. That alone was worth the fee.
Dr. M. Iyer
Anna University · Faculty
Grammar Correction
★★★★★
Submitted a Springer revision at 2 a.m., editor returned the polished manuscript by lunchtime. Tense was reconciled across the methods and discussion — something the previous round had missed entirely.
S. Banerjee
JU Kolkata · PhD
Journal-ready tier
★★★★★
BrE locked across the whole thesis. My supervisor's pet hates list was honoured to the letter. Honest pricing, exact deadline, no chasing.
R. Khan
AMU · Faculty
Grammar Correction
★★★★★
We send the M.Phil. cohort each year for grammar pass before the viva. Two years running now. Same editor, same standard, no surprises in the invoice.
A. Nair
Christ University · Research office
Institutional batch
Questions
FAQ
-
Grammar correction stays at the sentence level — articles, tense, agreement, prepositions, register, run-ons, modifiers, and word choice. Copy-editing goes further: paragraph-level reorganisation, argument tightening, and supervisor-style suggestions in the margin. If your draft needs structural rework, ask about our Copy-Editing service at quote — it is priced separately and bundled at a discount when ordered together.
-
No. Every chapter is read and corrected by a human PhD subject editor. Tools flag patterns; they cannot judge whether your discipline allows "data is" or insists on "data are". They cannot tell whether "the experiment" or "an experiment" is the right article in your sentence. We do not run your draft through Grammarly before or after our pass.
-
Yes — and that is the point. The marked-up .docx returns with every edit annotated and a one-line reason in the margin for every non-trivial edit. Your supervisor opens the file, scrolls, and sees exactly what we did and why. Many supervisors actively prefer this over a clean copy because they can audit the editor's judgement.
-
Whichever you specify at brief. We lock to a single variant across the manuscript: BrE (Oxford or non-Oxford comma), AmE, or Indian English (which follows BrE conventions with a few institutional preferences — "viva voce", "gazetted", "crore"). If your supervisor or target journal has a preference, send it; we honour it.
-
Not for grammar correction — the editor will polish the prose regardless of provenance. But if your concern is AI-detection scores at submission, that is a different service: AI Reduction rewrites flagged text to read naturally and pass detectors. If your draft has both grammar issues and high AI-detected percentages, we will combine the two passes into one quotation.
-
Yes. Send any 2–3 pages and we'll return them edited at no charge — the same editor, the same track-changes format, the same one-line reasons. You see the standard before you commit to a full thesis. Most scholars who request a sample come back with the rest of the manuscript within the week.
-
Anything within the original scope — re-checking a paragraph you revised after delivery, reconciling tense in a new sub-section you added, or polishing the abstract one more time before submission. New chapters, fundamental rewrites, or switching between BrE and AmE are quoted separately. The window starts the day we deliver.
-
Files are stored on encrypted servers for thirty days post-delivery (so we can support touch-ups) and then permanently deleted. We do not share files with third parties, do not feed your work to any model, and will sign an NDA on request at no charge. Your draft is yours alone.
§ Begin
Send the chapter. Receive it back, every edit annotated.
Articles, tense, agreement, prepositions, register, run-ons, modifiers, word choice. Eight error classes, one PhD subject editor, every edit annotated. Argument and citations untouched.