§ AI Reduction · Manual rewriting for AI-flagged prose

AI score under ten percent — by rewriting, not by humanising tools.

Twenty-seven PhD subject editors rewrite the sentences your detector flagged — preserving citations, your argument and the voice your supervisor already knows. No AI humanisers, no synonym swappers, no second pass through a model.

  • 010% AI on a fresh report. That's the target on every file. If the first pass comes back over, the same editor keeps working until it reads at most under 20% — no extra fee, no second clock.
  • 02Rewritten by humans, not "humanised". AI-humanisers re-trip the next detector. People don't.
  • 03Citations and voice preserved. Reference numbers, in-text citations, your data — untouched.
  • 04From 6 hours. Most chapter-length jobs return the same business day.
↓ The rewrite, sentence by sentence · Pricing slabs · Common questions

New submission

id · DRAFT-26.04
Drop file or click to upload
.docx · .doc · .pdf · max 50 MB
✓ Valid number
Note: At this moment, there is a delay in report generation. We will deliver your report as soon as the technical issue behind report generation gets resolved.
AI score · before, after avg. delivery · Apr 2026 cohort
The trajectory above is an average across 4,800+ AI Reductions delivered since the service opened in 2023. Most scholars arrive at us after a self-rewrite that brought their score down but not far enough — the last twenty points are where humans clearly outperform tools.
0%
AI score on delivery
98.7% of files · or under 20%, guaranteed
4,800+
reductions delivered
since the service opened, 2023
27
PhD subject editors
every chapter, hand-matched
6 hr
typical turnaround
chapter-length, same business day
Trusted by scholars at IIT Delhi · Delhi University · JNU · BITS Pilani · Anna University · Amity · Manipal · Christ · Symbiosis · IIM Indore · MDU Rohtak · Pondicherry University
§ 02 · The rewrite

What an editor actually changes — sentence by sentence.

A genuine excerpt from a Public Health discussion chapter that arrived at 71% AI. The middle column names the move; the right column shows the result. No tools touched the file.
Submitted draft 71% AI
Returned to author 6% AI
Before

Furthermore, the empirical findings comprehensively substantiate the theoretical underpinnings of the conceptual framework, indicating that the relationship between socioeconomic determinants and health outcomes operates through multiple, interrelated pathways.

It is important to note that these results align with previous literature in the field, and they offer significant insights into the multifaceted nature of the phenomenon under investigation. Consequently, future research endeavours should explore the nuanced dynamics of these interactions in order to advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms.

After

Our findings sit comfortably with the framework. The link between socioeconomic conditions and health runs through several pathways at once, not one.

The pattern matches earlier work, and the contribution is that we can now name which pathway carries which share of the effect. The next step is the obvious one — test the same pathways against a different cohort.

Editor's note

The two paragraphs above are the chapter's strongest claims, so I rewrote them slowly. The remaining 38 paragraphs in the chapter took two hours; these took forty minutes. Most of the AI score sits in the discussion section — that's where I spent the day. Citations, equations and your descriptive stats in §3.4 are untouched. — Dr. K., Public Health

EngineHuman · 27 PhD editors on staff · Tools usedNone — no humanisers, no paraphrasers · BibliographyUntouched · Voice matchAgainst your earlier chapters
§ 03 · The diagnosis

What actually trips a detector — and what we change.

01

The even cadence

Models write sentences of similar length — 18, 17, 19 words. Humans don't. We break the cadence: a long claim, then a short one, then a fragment.

AI The empirical findings comprehensively substantiate the theoretical framework underpinning this study.
Human The findings back the framework. Mostly.
02

The hedging scaffold

"It is important to note that…", "It can be observed that…", "It is worth mentioning…". Stalling phrases that signal nothing. Cut every one.

AI It is important to note that these results align with previous literature in the field.
Human The pattern matches earlier work.
03

The Latinate register

"Endeavours", "elucidate", "underpinnings", "delineate", "multifaceted". Models reach for them; thesis writers under deadline don't. We swap them out without losing precision.

AI Future research endeavours should elucidate the multifaceted dynamics.
Human The next step is to test the same pathways against a different cohort.
04

The over-balanced argument

Models hedge every claim, then re-hedge the hedge. We let your strongest sentence carry weight on its own — the way your earlier chapters already do.

AI While the results are suggestive, it should be acknowledged that further investigation may be warranted.
Human The result holds. Whether it generalises is the next question.
The four tells above account for roughly 78% of what AI detectors actually flag. The remaining 22% is paragraph-level — argument shape, claim density, citation rhythm — and is where a subject expert's reading does its real work.
§ 04 · The process

From flagged draft to clean delivery — step by step.

  1. i.

    Upload + AI report

    Drop your document and your latest AI detection report. No report yet? We'll run an AI Report first and credit the fee toward reduction.

  2. ii.

    Quote · within five minutes

    We read the report, slot you into the right pricing slab, and email you a quotation. No payment until you approve.

  3. iii.

    Manual rewrite

    Your file is hand-matched to a PhD editor in your subject. Each flagged passage is rewritten by hand — citations preserved, your voice matched against earlier chapters.

  4. iv.

    Delivery + fresh AI report

    You receive the rewritten document and a fresh AI detection report on or before the deadline. If the score is 20% or above, the same editor picks it up the next morning — no extra fee.

Don't have a current AI detection report? Run an AI Report first — about ten minutes, ₹500 onwards. We'll quote your reduction off the resulting report. The report fee is credited toward reduction if you proceed within seven days.

§ 05 · Pricing

By starting AI percentage, per page.

Per-page fees in INR. USD billing available for international scholars.
Starting AI scorePer pageTAT (40 pp.)What this slab covers
11–20%₹120/pg6 hrsLight touch — flagged sentences only.Quote →
21–30% Most common₹140/pg12 hrsStandard rewrite. Most theses fall here.Quote →
31–40%₹170/pg24 hrsFull chapter pass. Subject-matched editor.Quote →
41–50%₹190/pg24–36 hrsHeavy rewrite. Cadence and register reset.Quote →
51–60%₹220/pg36–48 hrsSubstantial sections rebuilt against sources.Quote →
61–70%₹240/pg48 hrsMost paragraphs replaced. Voice match required.Quote →
71–80%₹290/pg48–72 hrsNear-total rewrite. Argument re-anchored.Quote →
81–90%₹310/pg3–5 daysFull reconstruction by senior editor.Quote →
91–100%₹350/pg3–5 daysFull reconstruction by senior editor.Quote →
Bibliography & quoted text
Excluded from page count.
Re-runs
Free, until under 20% AI.
Fresh AI report
Bundled with delivery — no extra fee.
§ The promise

Zero percent AI is the target. Under twenty is the floor.

Every document is rewritten with the goal of returning 0% AI on a fresh detection report — and that is what 98.7% of files actually deliver at. If a particularly stubborn passage holds the score above zero, the editor keeps working until it reads at most under 20%. No second invoice, no second clock, no compromise. If we cannot get below twenty, the file is free.

  • Target · 0% AI on a fresh detection report — what most files hit.
  • Floor · Under 20% AI, guaranteed on every delivery.
  • If we miss the floor · Re-run free, same editor, next business day.
  • If we still miss · Senior editor takes the file. No fee, ever.
  • Refund · Full, if we cannot get under 20%. We have not issued one in 2024.
§ 06 · Voices

What scholars say after the rewrite lands in their inbox.

★★★★★
Came in at 64% on a free detector after I had panicked-rewritten my own discussion chapter. They returned it at 7%, and the prose actually sounded like the rest of my thesis again. Three humanisers I'd tried earlier had flattened my voice completely.
Pranav S.
IIT Bombay · PhD
AI Reduction
★★★★★
I had used ChatGPT to draft my literature review and was honest about it. Their editor read it, told me which paragraphs needed full rebuilding and which only needed a cadence fix, and sent the rewrite in fourteen hours. AI score 4%.
Devika M.
Symbiosis · MA
AI Reduction
★★★★★
The before/after report came with an editor's note explaining which moves they had used in the discussion section. I have since used it as a writing checklist for chapters five and six. Best ₹3,800 I have spent on this thesis.
Dr. K. Padmaja
IIT Madras
AI Reduction
★★★★★
Submitted at 11 PM after a frantic detector run. Reduction back at 9 AM. The editor flagged two paragraphs as already human and said no rewriting was needed there — saved me about ₹400. The honesty is the reason I came back.
R. Kothari
Amity Mumbai
AI Reduction
★★★★★
Had tried two AI humanisers before this. The first re-tripped Turnitin; the second mangled my citations. Their human pass got me to 6%, citations exactly where I had put them, and my supervisor read it and asked nothing.
A. Verghese
Christ · M.Phil
AI Reduction
★★★★★
Our research office sends a batch reduction every M.Phil. cycle now. The 0% target has held every time but two — and on those two we got under 20%, well within the university threshold. The cover note from the editor — naming the moves — is what gets the cohort to actually learn the lesson.
Dr. M. Khan
AMU · Research office
Institutional batch
Questions

FAQ

  • AI reduction is carried out entirely through manual rewriting by our expert team. Our specialists read the flagged content carefully and rewrite it in a natural, human voice while preserving the original meaning, structure, and academic tone. We do not use any automated paraphrasing tools, as these typically increase AI detection scores further. The result is a document that reads naturally and performs well on AI detection platforms.

§ Begin

Send the flagged draft. Receive prose that reads like you.

Twenty-seven PhD editors. Manual rewriting. Cadence varied, hedging cut, register loosened, voice matched against your earlier chapters. No humanisers, no paraphrasers, no second pass through a model.

  • Turnaround · From 6 hours · same-day available
  • Pricing · From ₹50 / page
  • Guarantee · 0% AI target · under 20% floor
  • Support · 24×7, including weekends and exam season

New submission

id · DRAFT-26.04
Drop file or click to upload
.docx · .doc · .pdf · max 50 MB
✓ Valid number
Note: At this moment, there is a delay in report generation. We will deliver your report as soon as the technical issue behind report generation gets resolved.